Resources
Biology 0610 Exam technique 7 min read Free

Why you lose marks on “explain” questions

Explain answers often lose marks because they say what happens, not why. Here is how to spot that and fix it, with Biology 0610 examples.

On this page
  1. The symptom
  2. The causes
  3. The fix
  4. Before and after
  5. Check yourself
  6. Where to go next
Start here

The symptom

You know the topic. You write a full paragraph. It comes back with one mark out of four, and the mark scheme seems to ask for the same thing in different words.

Usually it is not the same thing. Your answer said what happens. The mark scheme wanted the reasons it happens, written as a chain of links. Mark schemes usually credit the links separately, so a missing link usually means a missing mark.

The 0610 syllabus is clear on the difference. Describe means say what something is like or what happens. Explain means give the reasons: why or how, backed up with evidence.

A quick test
Read your answer from the last sentence back to the first. At each sentence, ask why. If the sentence before it does not answer, a link is missing, and so is a mark.
Diagnose it

Six reasons explain answers lose marks

Most weak explain answers have one or more of these faults. Check your last marked paper against the list.

Describing when asked to explain
Restating the pattern, such as “the rate goes up and then down”, shows you read the data. It does not say why the pattern happens.
Skipping the middle link
“Temperature increases, so the rate increases” jumps from cause to result. The mark sits in the step between: what the molecules are doing.
Vague words
“It”, “affects”, “works better” and “energy” on its own do not name anything. Examiners credit named structures, substances and processes.
Everyday words in place of the term
Enzymes are not “killed”, and water does not “soak in”. Use the syllabus word: denatured, osmosis, partially permeable membrane.
Too few ideas for the marks
A four-mark question needs four separate points. One idea written at length is still one idea.
Ignoring the context
If the question gives data, a named organism or an experiment, use it. An answer that could sit under any question rarely reaches full marks.
The method

The fix: build a chain, one link per mark

Use these steps on every question that starts with explain. They take less than a minute once they are a habit.

  1. Find what you are explaining

    Underline the command word and the thing to be explained. If there is data, the thing to explain is the pattern in the data.

  2. Count the marks

    Plan one separate idea for each mark. If you can think of one more, add it as a spare.

    Tip. Two short sentences with two ideas beat one long sentence with one.
  3. Build the chain

    Start with the cause, then say what happens at the level of molecules or cells, then give the result. That middle step is the one most often missing.

  4. Join the links

    Use “so”, “because” and “which means” between ideas. A list of true facts with no links does not show the relationship.

  5. Use the syllabus terms

    Swap every everyday word for the term in your notes: active site, denatured, water potential, partially permeable membrane.

  6. Tie it to the question

    Quote a value from the data, or name the organism, organ or experiment the question gives. Then delete any line that only repeats the question.

See it in action

Before and after: the same answer, fixed

Here is an original Extended question on enzymes, first with a typical weak answer, then rebuilt as a chain.

Before: a typical answer
“The rate goes up as the temperature goes up because the enzyme works better. After 40 °C the rate goes down and at 60 °C the enzyme dies.”

This answer describes the pattern correctly, but it gives no reason for it. “Works better” is not a reason. “Dies” is wrong: enzymes are proteins, not living things, so they are denatured. Against the four mark points below, it earns little or nothing.

After · explaining enzyme results[4 marks]

A student timed how long the enzyme amylase took to digest starch at five temperatures. The results are shown below. Explain these results.

20 °C: 180 s30 °C: 90 s40 °C: 45 s50 °C: 120 s60 °C: not digested
Mark 1
From 20 °C to 40 °C the time falls from 180 s to 45 s, so the rate increases. The molecules gain kinetic energy and move faster.
Kinetic energy, linked to the rise in rate
Mark 2
So there are more frequent effective collisions between enzyme and substrate, and more enzyme-substrate complexes form.
Frequency of effective collisions
Mark 3
Above the optimum, which is about 40 °C here, some active sites change shape. Starch no longer fits them, so digestion slows to 120 s at 50 °C.
Shape and fit of the active site
Mark 4
At 60 °C the enzyme is denatured: its shape has changed permanently, so no starch is digested.
Denaturation, tied to the 60 °C result
Four linked ideas, one for each mark
Mark split is our own illustration of how a mark scheme typically rewards each stage, not taken from a real paper.

Look at what changed. Each sentence leads to the next with “so”, and each one gives a reason. The terms come straight from the syllabus: kinetic energy, effective collisions, active site, denatured. And the answer uses the data: it quotes the times at 20 °C, 40 °C and 50 °C, and the result at 60 °C.

Your turn

Check yourself

Use the six steps on this question. It is worth three marks, so plan three linked ideas before you write.

Try it yourselfExtended · 3 marks

Strips of potato are left in pure water for 30 minutes. They become longer and firmer. Explain why.

Show a full-mark chain
Pure water has a higher water potential than the cell sap.
So water moves into the cells by osmosis, from a higher to a lower water potential, through the partially permeable cell membrane.
The vacuole swells and pushes the cell membrane against the cell wall, so the cells become turgid. The strip is longer and firmer.

Read it from the end back: each sentence is answered by the one before it.
Keep going

Where to go next

Practise on a topic you know well.
Pick one explain question from the notes, write your chain, then check it against the model answer at the end of the chapter.