How the Papers Work
Every mark in this qualification is awarded against a named objective. Learn the architecture first, and every later chapter becomes a matter of aiming.
The two papers
First Language English is assessed by two written papers of two hours each. They carry 80 marks apiece and contribute equally to the grade. Nothing else counts.
Equal weight, opposite emphasis
The symmetry is deliberate. Paper 1 gives candidates three texts and asks them to prove they have understood and analysed them. Paper 2 gives candidates far less to read and asks them to produce writing of their own. Both are worth exactly half.
What separates them is the assessment objective weighting. Paper 1 awards four fifths of its marks for reading. Paper 2 awards four fifths for writing. A candidate strong in one and weak in the other cannot hide: each weakness is exposed by a full half of the qualification.
| Component | Duration | Reading | Writing | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 — Reading | 2 hours | 80% | 20% | 80 |
| Paper 2 — Directed Writing and Composition | 2 hours | 20% | 80% | 80 |
| Qualification | 4 hours | 50% | 50% | 160 |
What sits on the desk
Both papers supply their texts on a separate insert, and dictionaries are not permitted in either. In Paper 1 the three texts run to roughly 1400 words in total, and roughly fifteen minutes should be spent reading them before a single answer is written. In Paper 2 the stimulus is shorter — 550 to 650 words across one or two texts — because the writing, not the reading, is the point.
Paper 1 · Questions 1 and 2
Paper 1 asks four compulsory questions, each worth 20 marks. Question 1 addresses Text A; Question 2 addresses Text B; Questions 3 and 4 both address Text C.
Question 1 — Comprehension · 20 marks
A series of sub-questions on Text A, testing understanding of both explicit and implicit meaning. From 2027 this question carries the full range of reading objectives: R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5. It is no longer a warm-up — a comprehension answer may now be asked to analyse, to evaluate, or to comment on how the writer achieves an effect.
Question 2 — Summary · 20 marks
| Part | Task | Objectives | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2(a) | Selective summary of Text B, in your own words, continuous prose, no more than 120 words | R1 R2 R5 · W1 W2 W3 | 10 + 5 |
| 2(b) | Short answer on the attitudes and opinions in the text | R2 R3 | 5 |
Note the shape of 2(a): ten marks are for reading — did you select the right ideas? — and five are for writing — did you express them economically, in continuous prose, in your own words? Copying from the text forfeits both.
Paper 1 · Questions 3 and 4
Questions 3 and 4 both work on Text C. The first asks what the writer did; the second asks the candidate to do something with it.
Question 3 — Short answers and language · 20 marks
Two halves, ten marks each. The short-answer half tests understanding of particular words and phrases in context. The language half asks for about 200–250 words analysing how the writer uses language to convey meaning and create effect. Both halves assess R1, R2 and R4. Words the question wants you to attend to are now printed in bold, and a sub-question asking you to show understanding of an identified word carries 2 marks — enough to require a real explanation, not a synonym.
Question 4 — Extended response to reading · 20 marks
A piece of writing of about 250–300 words, in a form the question specifies, drawing on Text C. The marks divide cleanly: 10 for reading (R1, R2, R3, R5) — did you use the text, develop its ideas, and support what you claim? — and 10 for writing (W1, W2, W3, W4) — did you sound like the person the question asked you to be? The six permitted text types are letter, report, journal, speech, interview and article. An answer written in the wrong form has already lost its register marks before the examiner reaches the second paragraph.
Paper 2 · Sections A and B
Paper 2 asks two questions, one from each section, and both are worth 40 marks. Section A is compulsory. Section B offers a choice of four titles.
Section A — Directed Writing · 40 marks
Based on one or two texts totalling 550–650 words. The task now comes in two parts.
| Part | Task | Objectives | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1(a) | Structured question — analyse and evaluate the text(s) | R3 R4 | 5 |
| 1(b) | A discursive, argumentative or persuasive speech, letter, article or report, about 250–350 words | R1 R2 R3 R5 · W1–W5 | 10 + 25 |
Section B — Composition · 40 marks
Four titles are offered: two descriptive and two narrative. One is chosen, and about 350–450 words are written. Every mark is a writing mark — W1 to W5. There is no text to lean on and no reading credit to collect. The marks divide internally into content and structure on one side and style and accuracy on the other. A vivid piece that is carelessly punctuated and a correct piece that is inert both land in the middle band; the top band requires both at once.
The ten objectives
Ten objectives. Five for reading, five for writing. Every mark in the qualification is one of these, and the question always tells you which.
AO1 · Reading
| Objective | The syllabus says | What the marker is doing |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | Understand explicit meanings | Checking you found what the text actually states |
| R2 | Understand implicit meanings and attitudes | Checking you read between the lines and named the feeling |
| R3 | Analyse, evaluate and develop facts, ideas and opinions, with support from the text | Checking you went past summary into judgement — and evidenced it |
| R4 | Understand how writers achieve effects and influence readers | Checking you can explain why this word, not just what it means |
| R5 | Select and use information for specific purposes | Checking you took only what the question asked for |
AO2 · Writing
| Objective | The syllabus says | What the marker is doing |
|---|---|---|
| W1 | Articulate experience; express what is thought, felt and imagined | Looking for a mind at work, not a form filled in |
| W2 | Organise and structure facts, ideas and opinions for deliberate effect | Asking whether the order was chosen or merely happened |
| W3 | Use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures appropriate to context | Testing precision and variety — not length of word |
| W4 | Use language appropriate to purpose and to engage the audience | Asking whether you knew who you were writing to |
| W5 | Make accurate use of spelling, punctuation and grammar | Counting errors, and where they impede meaning — not assessed on Paper 1 |
The eleven command words
The command word is the instruction. Read it first, and let it dictate the shape of the answer before a single idea is chosen.
| Command | What it demands |
|---|---|
| Analyse (new) | Examine in detail to show meaning; identify the elements and the relationship between them |
| Assess (new) | Make an informed judgement |
| Consider (new) | Review and respond to given information |
| Describe | State the points of a topic; give characteristics and main features |
| Evaluate (new) | Judge the quality, importance, amount or value of something |
| Explain | Set out purposes or reasons; make relationships clear; say why and how, supported with evidence |
| Give | Produce an answer from a given source or from recall |
| Identify | Name, select or recognise |
| Justify (new) | Support a case with evidence or argument |
| Outline (new) | Set out the main points |
| Suggest (new) | Apply understanding where a range of valid responses exists; put forward considerations |
What changed for 2027
The four reading skills survive the revision intact. They were renumbered, re-marked and redistributed — but a candidate who can comprehend, summarise, analyse language and respond in form is prepared for either paper.
Paper 1 · the same skills, redealt
| Skill | 2027–29 | 2024–26 |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehension | Q1 · 20 marks · R1–R5 | Q1(a)–(e) · 15 marks · R1, R2, R5 |
| Summary | Q2(a) 15 marks + Q2(b) 5 marks (new) | Q1(f) · 15 marks — no equivalent |
| Short answer + language | Q3 · 20 marks · 200–250 words | Q2 · 25 marks · 200–300 words |
| Extended response | Q4 · 20 marks · 250–300 words | Q3 · 25 marks · 250–350 words |
| Texts | ~1400 words combined | A/B 700–750, C 500–650 |
Paper 2 · one genuinely new demand
| Element | 2027–29 | 2024–26 |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulus texts | 550–650 words | 650–750 words |
| Structure | 1(a) + 1(b) | Single undivided task |
| R4 assessed? | Yes — at 1(a) | No — not on this paper |
| Permitted forms | Speech, letter, article, report | Speech, letter, article |
| Composition | Unchanged · 350–450 words | Unchanged · 350–450 words |
If a single line summarises the revision, it is this: the new paper asks candidates to judge as well as to understand. Analysis of a writer's technique has moved into places it never previously reached, and the command-word list has grown to match.
Exam advice
Common mistakes
Model answer
Recall checklist
- State the duration, mark total and weighting of each paper.
- Identify the four questions of Paper 1 and the marks each carries.
- Distinguish Question 2(a) from Question 2(b) by objective and by task.
- Outline the two parts of Paper 2 Section A and what each assesses.
- Explain the difference between R1, R2 and R3 in one sentence each.
- Describe what W4 asks of a writer, in the 2027 wording.
- Analyse why the arrival of Evaluate and Justify signals a change in demand.
- Give the word limits for every extended task across both papers.
Every First Language English chapter, in one PDF you keep
Print it, write on it, revise with no wifi and no ads. One payment — not a subscription.
Get the First Language English PDFReady to test this? Practise with First Language English past papers and mark schemes →
Like what you're reading?
Get the complete First Language English PDF — every topic, print-ready, yours to keep.
Get the First Language English PDF