First Language English · IGCSE 0500 · Foundations

How the Papers Work

Every mark in this qualification is awarded against a named objective. Learn the architecture first, and every later chapter becomes a matter of aiming.

The two papers

First Language English is assessed by two written papers of two hours each. They carry 80 marks apiece and contribute equally to the grade. Nothing else counts.

Definition
Component
A separately assessed part of the qualification. Paper 1 and Paper 2 are the two that carry grades.

Equal weight, opposite emphasis

The symmetry is deliberate. Paper 1 gives candidates three texts and asks them to prove they have understood and analysed them. Paper 2 gives candidates far less to read and asks them to produce writing of their own. Both are worth exactly half.

What separates them is the assessment objective weighting. Paper 1 awards four fifths of its marks for reading. Paper 2 awards four fifths for writing. A candidate strong in one and weak in the other cannot hide: each weakness is exposed by a full half of the qualification.

Definition
Assessment objective
The named skill against which a mark is awarded. Ten are examinable: five reading (R1–R5), five writing (W1–W5).
ComponentDurationReadingWritingMarks
Paper 1 — Reading2 hours80%20%80
Paper 2 — Directed Writing and Composition2 hours20%80%80
Qualification4 hours50%50%160

What sits on the desk

Both papers supply their texts on a separate insert, and dictionaries are not permitted in either. In Paper 1 the three texts run to roughly 1400 words in total, and roughly fifteen minutes should be spent reading them before a single answer is written. In Paper 2 the stimulus is shorter — 550 to 650 words across one or two texts — because the writing, not the reading, is the point.

Examiner note
The 50/50 split is the single most under-used fact in this subject. Candidates rehearse reading and neglect composition — then lose a quarter of the qualification on one 40-mark title.
Why this matters
Knowing that Paper 1 is 80% reading tells you where to spend revision hours. Time follows marks, not comfort.
Legacy 2024–26
Timings, mark totals and the 50/50 weighting are unchanged from the 2024–26 legacy paper. What changed is the internal structure of both papers, and the length of the texts.

Paper 1 · Questions 1 and 2

Paper 1 asks four compulsory questions, each worth 20 marks. Question 1 addresses Text A; Question 2 addresses Text B; Questions 3 and 4 both address Text C.

Definition
Explicit meaning
What the text states outright. Retrievable by pointing. Assessed as R1.

Question 1 — Comprehension · 20 marks

A series of sub-questions on Text A, testing understanding of both explicit and implicit meaning. From 2027 this question carries the full range of reading objectives: R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5. It is no longer a warm-up — a comprehension answer may now be asked to analyse, to evaluate, or to comment on how the writer achieves an effect.

Definition
Implicit meaning
What the text conveys without stating — attitude, feeling, suggestion. Assessed as R2.

Question 2 — Summary · 20 marks

PartTaskObjectivesMarks
2(a)Selective summary of Text B, in your own words, continuous prose, no more than 120 wordsR1 R2 R5 · W1 W2 W310 + 5
2(b)Short answer on the attitudes and opinions in the textR2 R35

Note the shape of 2(a): ten marks are for reading — did you select the right ideas? — and five are for writing — did you express them economically, in continuous prose, in your own words? Copying from the text forfeits both.

Examiner note
Question 2(a) is the only task in the paper with a hard word ceiling. Writing beyond 120 words does not earn more marks; the examiner stops reading, and the marks for concision are already gone.
Why this matters
Selective summary is the skill a lawyer uses reading a contract and a doctor uses reading a chart: extract only what the question needs, and leave the rest.
Legacy 2024–26
Comprehension was worth 15 marks, tested only R1, R2 and R5, and shared Question 1 with the summary task — in practice a retrieval exercise. The summary sat inside Question 1 as part 1(f), worth 15 marks; there was no separate five-mark attitudes question, which is genuinely new material for 2027 candidates.

Paper 1 · Questions 3 and 4

Questions 3 and 4 both work on Text C. The first asks what the writer did; the second asks the candidate to do something with it.

Definition
Language task
An extended analysis of how a writer's word choices and imagery create effect. Assessed as R1, R2 and R4.
Definition
Text type
The form a piece of writing takes. Six are examinable at Q4: letter, report, journal, speech, interview, article.

Question 3 — Short answers and language · 20 marks

Two halves, ten marks each. The short-answer half tests understanding of particular words and phrases in context. The language half asks for about 200–250 words analysing how the writer uses language to convey meaning and create effect. Both halves assess R1, R2 and R4. Words the question wants you to attend to are now printed in bold, and a sub-question asking you to show understanding of an identified word carries 2 marks — enough to require a real explanation, not a synonym.

Question 4 — Extended response to reading · 20 marks

A piece of writing of about 250–300 words, in a form the question specifies, drawing on Text C. The marks divide cleanly: 10 for reading (R1, R2, R3, R5) — did you use the text, develop its ideas, and support what you claim? — and 10 for writing (W1, W2, W3, W4) — did you sound like the person the question asked you to be? The six permitted text types are letter, report, journal, speech, interview and article. An answer written in the wrong form has already lost its register marks before the examiner reaches the second paragraph.

Examiner note
The commonest zero-credit sentence in the language task is a variant of "this helps the reader imagine the scene." It names no effect and analyses no word. It earns nothing.
Why this matters
Question 4 is the only place on Paper 1 where writing objectives are assessed. Ten of its twenty marks are for how you write — voice, structure, register.
Legacy 2024–26
The short-answer-and-language question was Question 2, worth 25 marks, at 200–300 words, with target words underlined rather than bolded. The extended-response question was Question 3, worth 25 marks, split 15 reading and 10 writing, at 250–350 words — the reading weighting has fallen; the writing weighting has held.

Paper 2 · Sections A and B

Paper 2 asks two questions, one from each section, and both are worth 40 marks. Section A is compulsory. Section B offers a choice of four titles.

Definition
Directed writing
Writing produced to a specified form, audience and purpose, using ideas taken from a supplied text.
Definition
Composition
Original writing from a title alone. No stimulus text, no reading marks — pure craft.

Section A — Directed Writing · 40 marks

Based on one or two texts totalling 550–650 words. The task now comes in two parts.

PartTaskObjectivesMarks
1(a)Structured question — analyse and evaluate the text(s)R3 R45
1(b)A discursive, argumentative or persuasive speech, letter, article or report, about 250–350 wordsR1 R2 R3 R5 · W1–W510 + 25

Section B — Composition · 40 marks

Four titles are offered: two descriptive and two narrative. One is chosen, and about 350–450 words are written. Every mark is a writing mark — W1 to W5. There is no text to lean on and no reading credit to collect. The marks divide internally into content and structure on one side and style and accuracy on the other. A vivid piece that is carelessly punctuated and a correct piece that is inert both land in the middle band; the top band requires both at once.

Examiner note
Section B is 40 marks for one piece of writing — a quarter of the entire qualification resting on a single title. It is the highest-stakes half hour a candidate will sit, and the one most often left under-rehearsed.
Why this matters
Question 1(a) is new, and it is free reading marks for anyone who has practised close analysis. Candidates who skim it to reach the essay are discarding five marks.
Legacy 2024–26
Directed Writing was a single undivided task on texts of 650–750 words. Question 1(a) did not exist, and R4 was not assessed anywhere on this paper — analysis of a writer’s technique is a genuinely new demand. The report has also joined the permitted forms; the legacy paper allowed only speech, letter or article. The composition tasks themselves are unchanged — only the marking criteria have been rewritten, with a sharper demand for figurative language and close observation in the descriptive descriptors.

The ten objectives

Ten objectives. Five for reading, five for writing. Every mark in the qualification is one of these, and the question always tells you which.

Definition
Register
The level of formality and the tone a piece of writing adopts for its audience.

AO1 · Reading

ObjectiveThe syllabus saysWhat the marker is doing
R1Understand explicit meaningsChecking you found what the text actually states
R2Understand implicit meanings and attitudesChecking you read between the lines and named the feeling
R3Analyse, evaluate and develop facts, ideas and opinions, with support from the textChecking you went past summary into judgement — and evidenced it
R4Understand how writers achieve effects and influence readersChecking you can explain why this word, not just what it means
R5Select and use information for specific purposesChecking you took only what the question asked for

AO2 · Writing

ObjectiveThe syllabus saysWhat the marker is doing
W1Articulate experience; express what is thought, felt and imaginedLooking for a mind at work, not a form filled in
W2Organise and structure facts, ideas and opinions for deliberate effectAsking whether the order was chosen or merely happened
W3Use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures appropriate to contextTesting precision and variety — not length of word
W4Use language appropriate to purpose and to engage the audienceAsking whether you knew who you were writing to
W5Make accurate use of spelling, punctuation and grammarCounting errors, and where they impede meaning — not assessed on Paper 1
Examiner note
Examiners do not mark holistically and then justify. They mark against the objective the question names, then place the answer in a level. An answer that is beautiful but off-objective scores badly.
Why this matters
Learn the ten objectives and the mark scheme stops being a mystery. Every band descriptor in this syllabus is one of these ten skills, graded from ‘very limited’ to ‘highly effective’.
Legacy 2024–26
Cambridge states the skills assessed are unchanged. Two rewordings matter: W2 now names facts alongside ideas, and W4 has moved from ‘register appropriate to context’ to ‘language appropriate to purpose and to engage the audience’ — from correctness towards effect.

The eleven command words

The command word is the instruction. Read it first, and let it dictate the shape of the answer before a single idea is chosen.

Definition
Command word
The verb that fixes what an answer must do. It is chosen deliberately and it is never decorative.
CommandWhat it demands
Analyse (new)Examine in detail to show meaning; identify the elements and the relationship between them
Assess (new)Make an informed judgement
Consider (new)Review and respond to given information
DescribeState the points of a topic; give characteristics and main features
Evaluate (new)Judge the quality, importance, amount or value of something
ExplainSet out purposes or reasons; make relationships clear; say why and how, supported with evidence
GiveProduce an answer from a given source or from recall
IdentifyName, select or recognise
Justify (new)Support a case with evidence or argument
Outline (new)Set out the main points
Suggest (new)Apply understanding where a range of valid responses exists; put forward considerations
Examiner note
Explain and Describe are not interchangeable. Describe wants features; Explain wants reasons and evidence. Answering the wrong one is the most efficient way to score zero on a question you understood.
Why this matters
Seven of these eleven verbs are new for 2027. A candidate revising from legacy materials will meet Evaluate or Justify for the first time in the exam hall.
Legacy 2024–26
The legacy syllabus listed only Describe, Explain, Give and Identify. The seven additions are not cosmetic: Analyse, Evaluate and Justify demand judgement and evidence, and their arrival is the clearest signal of what the 2027 revision is reaching for — a candidate who argues, rather than one who retrieves.

What changed for 2027

The four reading skills survive the revision intact. They were renumbered, re-marked and redistributed — but a candidate who can comprehend, summarise, analyse language and respond in form is prepared for either paper.

Definition
Specification
The syllabus edition governing a given exam series. Cambridge revised 0500 for first examination in 2027.

Paper 1 · the same skills, redealt

Skill2027–292024–26
ComprehensionQ1 · 20 marks · R1–R5Q1(a)–(e) · 15 marks · R1, R2, R5
SummaryQ2(a) 15 marks + Q2(b) 5 marks (new)Q1(f) · 15 marks — no equivalent
Short answer + languageQ3 · 20 marks · 200–250 wordsQ2 · 25 marks · 200–300 words
Extended responseQ4 · 20 marks · 250–300 wordsQ3 · 25 marks · 250–350 words
Texts~1400 words combinedA/B 700–750, C 500–650

Paper 2 · one genuinely new demand

Element2027–292024–26
Stimulus texts550–650 words650–750 words
Structure1(a) + 1(b)Single undivided task
R4 assessed?Yes — at 1(a)No — not on this paper
Permitted formsSpeech, letter, article, reportSpeech, letter, article
CompositionUnchanged · 350–450 wordsUnchanged · 350–450 words

If a single line summarises the revision, it is this: the new paper asks candidates to judge as well as to understand. Analysis of a writer's technique has moved into places it never previously reached, and the command-word list has grown to match.

Examiner note
Check which syllabus you are entered for before you revise. A November 2026 candidate sits the legacy paper. A March or June 2027 candidate sits the new one. The skills overlap almost completely; the question numbers do not.
Why this matters
Most revision material in circulation still describes the legacy paper. If a resource tells you Paper 1 has three questions, it is describing an exam you may not be sitting.

Exam advice

Common mistakes

Writing past the 120-word ceiling on Question 2(a)
The examiner stops reading at the limit. Ideas beyond it are unmarked, and the writing marks for concision are already lost.
Answering Question 1(a) on Paper 2 in one line to reach the essay
It is worth five marks and tests R3 and R4 specifically. A one-line answer discards them.
Treating Analyse and Describe as the same instruction
Describe wants features; Analyse wants elements and the relationships between them. The wrong verb loses the objective the question was testing.

Model answer

A candidate is told their Paper 1 Question 4 response scored 11 out of 20. Explain where the remaining marks were most likely lost, and justify your answer.
[3 marks]
Mark 1
Identifies the split of the 20 marks
Question 4 awards 10 marks for reading (R1, R2, R3, R5) and 10 for writing (W1–W4). A mark of 11 means one side is failing.
Mark 2
Names the likelier failure and gives a reason
Reading marks are the commoner loss: candidates lift ideas from Text C rather than developing them, which caps R3 at the lower levels.
Mark 3
Justifies with reference to the objective
R3 requires ideas to be analysed, evaluated and developed with support. Reproduction of the text satisfies R1 alone, which is why fluent-sounding answers still stall near half marks.

Recall checklist

  • State the duration, mark total and weighting of each paper.
  • Identify the four questions of Paper 1 and the marks each carries.
  • Distinguish Question 2(a) from Question 2(b) by objective and by task.
  • Outline the two parts of Paper 2 Section A and what each assesses.
  • Explain the difference between R1, R2 and R3 in one sentence each.
  • Describe what W4 asks of a writer, in the 2027 wording.
  • Analyse why the arrival of Evaluate and Justify signals a change in demand.
  • Give the word limits for every extended task across both papers.

Every First Language English chapter, in one PDF you keep

Print it, write on it, revise with no wifi and no ads. One payment — not a subscription.

Get the First Language English PDF

Ready to test this? Practise with First Language English past papers and mark schemes →