Business Studies · IGCSE 0450 · §2.1–2.4

People in Business

Behind every business decision are the people who make it work — how they are motivated, organised, recruited, and kept informed.

Motivation: theories

Directors Managers Supervisors Employees CHAIN OF COMMAND fewer people · more authority more people · less authority
FIG 2.0 Most businesses organise their people as a hierarchy — authority narrows towards the top, numbers widen towards the base.

People work for more than money. Understanding why they work is the first step to keeping them productive — and a well-motivated workforce is measurably cheaper to run.

Definition
Motivation and Maslow’s hierarchy
Motivation is the reason a person works and the effort they put in. Maslow’s hierarchy ranks human needs in five levels — physiological, safety, social, esteem, self-actualisation — and each level must be largely met before the next motivates.

Why a motivated workforce matters

People work to earn a living, but also for security, the company of others, recognition and a sense of achievement. A business that meets these needs gains three concrete benefits: higher labour productivity, lower absenteeism, and lower labour turnover — the rate at which staff leave and must be replaced. Each lowers cost and protects quality.

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

Abraham Maslow argued that human needs form a hierarchy. A need only motivates while it is unmet; once satisfied, the next level up takes over. A business can motivate at every level — from a wage that covers food, rent and bills at the base, through safe conditions, teamworking and recognition, to challenging, fulfilling work at the top.

Self-actualisationChallenging projects, promotion, personal growthEsteemRecognition, praise, job titles and statusSocialTeamworking, a friendly canteen, belongingSafetyA permanent contract and safe conditionsPhysiologicalA wage that covers food, rent and bills
FIG 2.1 Each level of need suggests a different way for a business to motivate its staff.

Taylor: motivation through money

F. W. Taylor’s scientific management treated pay as the main motivator: break each job into simple, repeated tasks, then pay workers by output — a piece rate — so producing more earns more. It raises output for routine work, but ignores every non-financial need Maslow identified, and monotonous work can quickly demotivate.

Examiner note
Examiners want a named outcome — higher productivity, lower absenteeism or lower labour turnover — not a vague 'motivation is good for the business'.
Why this matters
A demotivated till operator is why a supermarket queue crawls even when every till is staffed.

Motivation: methods

If Taylor saw only money, Herzberg saw two separate forces at work — one that stops staff being unhappy, and another that actually drives them.

Herzberg: two factors

Frederick Herzberg split the causes of workplace feeling in two. Hygiene factors — pay, conditions, supervision, company policy — cause dissatisfaction when poor, but fixing them only removes unhappiness; they do not motivate. True motivators — achievement, recognition, responsibility and interesting work — are what lift effort. The practical lesson is job enrichment: redesign work to give it more challenge and responsibility.

Financial methods

A wage pays by time or by piece; a salary is a fixed annual sum paid monthly. On top sit incentives: a bonus for hitting a target, commission as a percentage of sales, and profit sharing, which hands employees a slice of the profit they helped create.

Definition
Bonus, commission, profit sharing
A bonus is a one-off extra payment for reaching a target. Commission is a percentage of sales. Profit sharing is a slice of profit paid to all employees. Job rotation moves staff between tasks to add variety and broaden skills.

Non-financial methods

Job enrichment and job rotation add challenge and variety; teamworking meets social needs; training and clear promotion opportunities give staff a path to grow. These map directly onto Maslow’s higher levels and Herzberg’s motivators. Worked example: a sandwich shop losing a third of its counter staff every year with low morale should try non-financial methods first — a pay rise lifts morale briefly but is costly and easily matched, while job rotation and training target the cause (boredom, not just pay) at low cost.

Examiner note
Bonus, commission and profit sharing are constantly confused. The mark scheme rewards the correct term, not just 'extra pay'.
Why this matters
A salesperson paid on commission behaves differently from one on a fixed salary — the incentive shapes every choice they make in the day.

Organisation, management and delegation

An organisational chart is a map of who does what and who answers to whom. Its shape — tall or flat — shapes how fast a business can decide and communicate.

Reading an organisational chart

A chart shows the levels of hierarchy, the chain of command running down them, and the span of control at each level. A tall structure has many levels and narrow spans: tight control, but slow communication. A flat structure has few levels and wide spans: faster and cheaper, but each manager stretches further.

Definition
Chain of command, span of control, delegation
The chain of command is the line of authority down which instructions pass. The span of control is the number of subordinates reporting directly to one manager. Delegation passes authority for a task down to a subordinate, while the manager keeps overall accountability.
Tall structureFlat structureCHAIN OF COMMANDspan of control = 2span of control = 5
FIG 2.2 The same team drawn two ways: a tall structure controls tightly; a flat one communicates faster.

Who does what

Directors set the overall strategy and are answerable to the owners. Managers run departments, make day-to-day decisions and motivate their teams. Supervisors oversee the daily work of employees and report upward. Employees carry out the tasks that deliver the product or service.

Managing and delegating

Management has five functions: planning, organising, coordinating, commanding and controlling. Doing all five alone is impossible, so managers delegate — handing authority downward. Delegation frees the manager and develops and motivates staff, but the manager stays accountable, so it demands trust as well as control.

Examiner note
Tall-vs-flat questions are tested through their effect on communication speed and control — not the diagram alone.
Why this matters
A five-person start-up can change direction overnight; a national retailer needs several layers of sign-off first.

Leadership styles and trade unions

How a manager leads is as important as how the business is structured. The right style depends entirely on the situation the business faces.

Definition
Trade union and autocratic leadership
A trade union is a group of workers that exists to protect and represent its members’ interests, such as pay and conditions. Autocratic leadership is a style where the leader makes decisions alone and tells staff what to do.

Three leadership styles

An autocratic leader decides alone and issues instructions — good when decisions are urgent or safety-critical, or staff are inexperienced, but it ignores staff ideas and can demotivate skilled workers. A democratic leader consults staff and decides together — good when staff are skilled and their input improves the decision, but slower and unsuitable when a fast call is needed. A laissez-faire leader sets goals then leaves staff to it — good for expert, self-motivated professionals, but work can drift without control. A fast-food kitchen at lunchtime needs autocratic direction; a design studio thrives under laissez-faire.

Trade unions

A trade union represents workers collectively. Membership can strengthen employees’ hand through collective bargaining over pay and conditions, and offers legal support. In return, a business may face slower negotiations and, in disputes, the threat of industrial action — though a recognised union can also give managers a single, organised channel to talk to staff.

Examiner note
Don't assume autocratic is always worse. The mark scheme rewards a choice justified against the situation, not a blanket judgement.
Why this matters
An emergency-room team leader who called a vote before acting would cost lives — context decides which style is right.

Recruitment and selection

Getting the right people in is a process, not a gamble. Recruitment attracts applicants; selection chooses between them.

Definition
Internal vs external recruitment; job description vs person specification
Internal recruitment fills a vacancy with an existing employee; external recruitment brings someone in from outside. A job description states the role’s duties and responsibilities; a person specification describes the ideal candidate.

Internal versus external

Internal recruitment is faster, cheaper and motivating, and the candidate is a known quantity — but it brings in no new ideas and leaves another vacancy behind. External recruitment widens the talent pool and brings fresh thinking, at higher cost and greater risk.

The main stages

Define the role (job description and person specification); advertise through the right channel; collect applications (CV or application form) and shortlist; select using interviews and, where useful, tests; then offer the post to the best-matched candidate.

Full-time or part-time?

A full-time employee gives continuity and deep familiarity with the business; a part-time employee adds flexibility to cover peaks and can be cheaper, but may be less available and costlier per head to train. Worked example: a growing bakery needing a shift supervisor should usually promote an experienced counter assistant — for an operational role built on trust, known reliability outweighs the fresh ideas an external hire would bring.

Examiner note
Job description and person specification are commonly swapped — one describes the role, the other the person.
Why this matters
A business that only ever promotes from within slowly runs out of fresh ideas, even as it saves time and money.

Training and the workforce

Once staff are hired they must be trained — and, when circumstances change, sometimes let go. Both are governed by law.

Definition
Induction training and redundancy
Induction training introduces a new employee to the workplace, their role and colleagues. Redundancy ends employment because the job itself is no longer needed — not because of the worker’s conduct or performance.

Three kinds of training

Induction settles a new starter in. On-the-job training teaches while the employee works, alongside a colleague — cheap and relevant, but errors happen live. Off-the-job training takes place away from the workplace with outside experts — higher quality and no live risk, but costly and time-consuming. Worked example: a salon training trainee stylists should build safe technique off the job first, protecting paying customers, then finish on the job.

Reducing the workforce

Dismissal ends employment because of the worker — poor conduct or performance, or breaking the contract. Redundancy ends it because the role is no longer needed — through automation, falling demand or a merger — and is no fault of the worker.

Legal controls over employment

Contracts must be set out in writing. Workers cannot be sacked without fair reason or process (unfair dismissal). Hiring and treatment must not be based on protected characteristics (discrimination). The business must provide safe working conditions (health and safety). Pay cannot fall below the legal floor (minimum wage).

Examiner note
Redundancy and dismissal are constantly confused: redundancy is the role disappearing; dismissal is about the worker.
Why this matters
A legal minimum wage exists because, without one, the biggest employer in a town could set pay unilaterally.

Communication

A business runs on information. Communication works only when the message is received and understood — which is why feedback matters as much as the message.

Definition
Internal and external communication
Internal communication is messages sent between people within the same business. External communication is messages between the business and outside parties — customers, suppliers, government.

Choosing a method

Messages travel internally, between staff, and externally, to customers, suppliers and government. Face-to-face gives instant feedback and clear tone but leaves no record and needs everyone present. Telephone is fast and personal across distance but leaves no record. Email gives a written record and reaches many at once but is easily ignored or misread. A notice-board is cheap and seen by all but one-way with no feedback. The best method depends on speed, cost, audience and whether a record is needed.

When communication breaks down

Communication is a loop: a sender encodes a message, sends it through a medium, and the receiver responds with feedback that confirms it landed — break any link and the message fails. Common barriers and their fixes: jargon or unclear language (use plain wording matched to the receiver); the wrong medium (match method to urgency and audience); a message too long or vague (keep it short and state the action needed); no feedback (invite a reply to confirm understanding).

SenderMediumReceivermessagemessagefeedback confirms the message was understood
FIG 2.3 Feedback closes the loop — without it, the sender never knows the message was understood.
Examiner note
Don't just name a barrier — state its consequence (a missed deadline, a demotivated worker) and how it was reduced.
Why this matters
One unclear email about a shift change can cost more in confusion than the time it saved in sending.

Exam advice

Common mistakes

Confusing redundancy with dismissal
Redundancy is the role disappearing — not the employee's conduct or performance.
"Motivation is good for the business" — with no named outcome
Loses the mark that a specific effect (productivity, absenteeism, turnover) would earn.
Treating autocratic as always wrong, democratic as always right
Marks come from justifying the choice against the business's situation, not a blanket rule.
Listing the functions of management without linking or applying them
Naming planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling alone scores little without application.
Confusing a job description with a person specification
One describes the role's duties; the other describes the person the business wants.

Model answer

Explain two methods of training a business might use. Which is likely to be the best method for a service business to use? Justify your answer.
[6 marks]
Knowledge 1–2
Identify two training methods
On-the-job training and off-the-job training — one mark each.
Analysis 3–4
Develop what each involves
On-the-job = learning while doing the role alongside a colleague; off-the-job = training away from work led by outside experts.
Evaluation 5–6
Justify a choice, rejecting the alternative
Off-the-job suits a service business because poor technique in front of customers harms its reputation — outweighing the higher cost.

Recall checklist

  • State two benefits of a well-motivated workforce.
  • Distinguish Taylor’s and Herzberg’s approach to motivation.
  • Explain how a bonus differs from profit sharing.
  • Distinguish between a tall and a flat structure.
  • Apply a leadership style to a given situation.
  • Explain one advantage and one disadvantage of internal recruitment.
  • Distinguish between redundancy and dismissal.
  • State three barriers to effective communication.

Every Business Studies topic, in one PDF you keep

Print it, write on it, revise with no wifi and no ads. One payment — not a subscription.

Get the Business Studies PDF

Ready to test this topic? Practise with Business Studies past papers and mark schemes →